interactions:tbeam
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| interactions:tbeam [2018/01/06 10:39] – ↷ Page moved from tbeam to interactions:tbeam daniel | interactions:tbeam [2018/01/22 17:47] (current) – daniel | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| The two band EAM potentials are an extension to the regular EAM potentials. Instead | The two band EAM potentials are an extension to the regular EAM potentials. Instead | ||
| of single transfer and embedding functions, different functions to model two bands are used. | of single transfer and embedding functions, different functions to model two bands are used. | ||
| + | Usually they are reffered to as d- and s-band contributions. | ||
| $$E_\text{total}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i< | $$E_\text{total}=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i< | ||
| Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
| $\rho^s_0, \ldots, \rho^s_N, | $\rho^s_0, \ldots, \rho^s_N, | ||
| $F^s_0, \ldots, F^s_N,$ | $F^s_0, \ldots, F^s_N,$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Special remarks | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tabulated two band EAM potentials require the embedding function $F_i$ to be defined at a density of $1.0$. | ||
| + | This is necessary to fix the gauge degrees of freedom. | ||
interactions/tbeam.1515231549.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/01/06 10:39 by daniel
